I'd like to take advantage of the controversy aroused by Sup. Moorlach's proposal to rescind retroactive pension hikes for OC deputies by having another prediction contest.
It's a simple one: how will the Board of Supervisors vote on July 31, when the pension recission item comes before them?
I usually don't join the contests, but my prediction is a 5-0 vote in favor of rescinding the retroactive pension hike. Your answer has to specify the Supervisors by name and which way they vote.
The prize: what else -- a Magic 8-Ball!
2-3
Norby, Moorlach--YES
Bates, Campbell, Nguyen--NO
Posted by: Mark Brainard | July 20, 2007 at 03:55 PM
Applaud the foresight and courage of Supervisor Moorlach! Bravo!!!
5-0
Posted by: Tom Tucker | July 20, 2007 at 04:21 PM
Every true fiscal conservative will vote yes.
Every mere politician will vote no.
Posted by: Ear to the Ground | July 20, 2007 at 04:39 PM
it will be placed on hold until a yet to be unknown meeting date
reasoning will be that until getting a real legal opinion from a court making change could cost more than paying until it is decided and to bypass any kind of counter suits that would be brought about if a change is made wihtout a court decree
so 3-2 to hold for another board in the future
Posted by: cold as ice | July 20, 2007 at 04:42 PM
If Janet votes against the Cops, politicaly speaking, she might as well take a ride up on that big Irvine balloon and jump out because they will be all over her when she runs for re-election and the Lincoln Club and the O.C. GOP won't do squat for her if she goes with Moorlock.
Posted by: Janet Can't | July 20, 2007 at 04:58 PM
3 to 2. My union apologist Supervisor(Campbell) and Nguyen will vote No and Moorlach, Bates & Norby will vote yes.
Posted by: Allan Bartlett | July 20, 2007 at 05:35 PM
A 5-0 vote makes sense to me.
Posted by: Art Pedroza | July 20, 2007 at 06:34 PM
Unfortunately, I see this losing 2-3 and here is why.
Nguyen barely was elected by the skin of her teeth, and would NOT want to face a tough rematch with the unions I.E.s against her.
Campbell by voting yes would have to admit he made a mistake and he was wrong. Forget that. Plus the AOCSD has rewarded him nicely. Campbell is pure RINO!
Bates got lots of I.E's on her behalf. So there is no way she will bite the hand that feeds her. Lest she get another nasty rematch with Cassie Deyoung who would have lots of $$$ on her side from AOCSD.
These 3 mentioned are self serving politicians who will not jeopardize their political careers. As for the taxpayers, we are all taking it in the shorts!
Posted by: Nostradumus | July 21, 2007 at 02:57 PM
I believe Nostradamus and Mark Brainard (and now I) have it right. But my guess is a final vote won't occur on the 31st - not until the winners stall a while and find a way to put a conservative spin on it (as in "this is a vote of support for public safety," etc.).
Posted by: redperegrine | July 21, 2007 at 03:20 PM