I didn't think we'd have to start the Orange Council Mailbox feature again so soon.
The general expectation has been Carol Rudat will run again for Orange City Council in 2008. Readers will recall Rudat shattered city campaign records by spending more than $200,000 on a council race crashed and burned due to the fact she didn't live in Orange. Even before her election day loss, she was overheard at the Diederich's on the Orange Circle plotting her revenge campaign in 2008.
Carol Rudat has been making the rounds of events, in addition to delivering some (from what I'm told) blistering public comments at a recent Orange City Council meeting.
A friend of mine received this mailer from Carol Rudat a week or two ago:
Mrs. Rudat basically took her 2006 campaign mail and inserted a little "by the way, I'm a realtor" blurb in the corner.
This is a pretty thinly veiled attempt to build up name ID under the guise of advertising her virtually non-existent realty work in Orange. We've all seen realtor mail: they advertise their recent sales or overall success selling houses -- not telling you about their dad or listing their civic credentials.
This is a de facto campaign piece, not a business advertisement.
It looks to be an ugly, angry election Orange council election.
This is a perfect example of why ALL campaign finance laws are stupid. She can mail this piece of mail and other poorly designed version just like it until Election Day and never have to report it.
Carol Rudat's history demonstrates that she will never be well received by voters in an election. But I support her right to spend whatever money she wants to, promoting her 'real estate business' and write it off as a business expense.
Posted by: Adam D. Probolsky | June 12, 2007 at 06:27 PM
Adam is right.
Not only is the mailer not reportable, it is probably tax deductible as an advertising expense for her realtor business.
Pretty crafty.
Unless, of course, she mailed it only to registered voters. That would violate state law and Secretary of State regulations.
Anyone know what list she used?
Posted by: One Who Knows | June 12, 2007 at 06:56 PM
One Who Knows:
Can you direct me to the code pertaining to the legality/illegality of mailing to only registered voters?
I had never heard of this and am curious to read more about it.
Thanks,
Joseph
Posted by: Joseph Turner | June 12, 2007 at 07:12 PM
Thinly disguised campaign mail sent out on the anniversary of Steve Ambriz death......despicable
Posted by: Phil Paule | June 12, 2007 at 07:16 PM
This exotic weed needs to be eradicated.
Posted by: redperigrine | June 12, 2007 at 07:33 PM
Mr. Turner:
Elections Code Section 2194:
(a) The voter registration card information identified in subdivision (a) of Section 6254.4 of the Government Code:
(1) Shall be confidential and shall not appear on any computer terminal, list, affidavit, duplicate affidavit, or other medium routinely available to the public at the county elections official's
office.
(2) Shall not be used for any personal, private, or commercial
purpose, including, but not limited to...
(B) The advertising, solicitation, sale, or marketing of products
or services to any voter or voter's household.
Posted by: One Who Knows | June 12, 2007 at 08:02 PM
If Jubal is still on his game by election 08, the readers of the OC Blog will once again have front row center seats to the best election sideshow this county has to offer. Bring on the Rudat!
Posted by: Don't Know Jack | June 13, 2007 at 09:36 AM
I am both a registered voter and a home owner in the city of Orange. Neither my wife nor I was mailed this piece.
It is possible that she is targeting a specific territory, area, neighborhood, what have you, to attempt to rebuild her real estate practice in a given area in Orange. That is a common practice among REALTORS. Especially considering many of the projections for this year's market.
Posted by: Chip Ahlswede | June 13, 2007 at 09:54 AM
Oh c'mon, Chip - this thing is a politcal mailer, pure and simple: Statue of Liberty, waving flag, family and community values, etc, etc.
The little tag about commission % is about the only clue that this woman is a realtor. My guess is you'll get one sooner or later.
Posted by: redperegrine | June 13, 2007 at 10:04 AM
When are you guys going to write about the 90-year old lady Rudat is suing? This elderly woman fired Rudat as her realtor. Rudat didn't sell her house. Now Rudat is suing the old woman for the commission on a house that never sold!
Posted by: Rudat is a shark | June 13, 2007 at 03:06 PM
It would seem that Rudat sues everybody. I have never seen so many lawsuits.
Posted by: | June 13, 2007 at 04:40 PM
Another interesting bit of information might be who (or what) paid for postal permit #217 in Orange.
Posted by: redperegrine | June 13, 2007 at 04:55 PM
I can also cooberate that Carol is suing the elderly lady with Alzheimers. Heard it from one of the neighbors, apprantly this has upset quite a few people who live around her. This lady has no morals. or ethics. She would be toxic on the city council and effectively destroy city politics in Orange. Though she has an extreme uphill battle to fight in 2008. Both Jon and Tita are incumbants and extremely well liked. She is a Baracuda.
Jon and Tita for 2008
Posted by: Carol can't win | June 13, 2007 at 05:17 PM
Carol Rudat makes me think about corrupt attorneys. (Allegedly)
Let her run again, she still lives in her fancy house and shows up here in Orange once and a great while. She is a real piece of work that women.
Cannot wait to shut her down on TV and on her little circus ride alongs.
Karen A Finn
Police Officers Wife
Posted by: Karen A Finn | September 27, 2007 at 07:44 PM