Last week was the deadline to introduce bills for the 2007 legislative session. I introduced 21 bills. One of the most important bills I introduced was AB 719. Its short title is: Energy: electrical generation: zero carbon dioxide emissions.
If this bill becomes law, we will be able to build modern, clean, and safe nuclear power plants in California. Without this bill, we will remain dependent on fossil fuel for most of our electrical generation needs, much of it imported from abroad, including from nations that don’t much like us. We will also find it virtually impossible to meet the greenhouse gas reduction targets of last year’s much acclaimed AB 32 bill signed into law by Gov. Schwarzenegger.
Today 16 percent of power generated within California comes from our two nuclear power plants. About 51 percent of our power is generated from natural gas-fired plants. A large amount of the power we import from out of state comes from coal-fired plants – a domestic energy source that a bill passed last year banned from contract renewal last year because of the large amounts of CO2 that burning coal for power releases into the atmosphere.
According to a Cal Berkeley report, over a 20 year period, U.S. nuclear power plants have offset the burning of coal and oil, averting, “…the cumulative emission of 1.6 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide, 65 million tons of sulphur dioxide, and 27 million tons of nitrogen oxides.”
Currently built nuclear power plants feature one-tenth the moving parts of 30-year-old designs and are 1,000 times less likely to fail (on top of an already very good safety record in the West).
The time is now. If we do not lift the ban on new construction here in California, other states will get in line in front of us to build new, efficient, safe and non-carbon emitting nuclear power plants.
Lastly, as to the issue of waste storage (the specific portion of the law I seek to repeal), it will take about 10 years to approve a plant, design it, license it, build it, fuel it, operate it, then perform the first change-out of the old rods. An approved storage method ought to ready by then – if we wait until it is, however, there is no physical way that we can meet the aggressive greenhouse gas reduction targets of AB 32 and still generate enough power to meet California’s growing needs.
To see the bill, click on the link below.
Oh, and one last thing for the critics: this bill is my own initiative (as are the vast majority of my bills). Some in the power business actually asked me to hold off on introducing a bill allowing nuclear power as they were not ready to advance the argument. I think we need to have the debate today. We can’t run our power grid on good intentions while other ways to generate electricity, such as solar, cost 5 to 9 times more than nuclear.
All the best,
Chuck DeVore
State Assemblyman, 70th District
www.ChuckDeVore.com
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_0701-0750/ab_719_bill_20070222_introduced.html