Carona Arraignment: The Firearm and a Crumbling Defense
Today I was on hand to see the Carona arrangment at the Ronald Reagan Federal Court House in Santa Ana. Although it was swift and occurred without incident a few events struck me.
Assistant US Attorney Brett Sagel confronted Carona lawyer H. Dean Steward over a bail stipulation involving Carona's possession of a firearm. Motioning to Judge Robert Black, Sagel argued the following:
There is a pattern of witness tampering and intimidation over the past three years, witnesses are scared of him.
To which Mr. Steward replied that Carona needs to keep the firearm in order to protect himself:
His life has been threated by many people, including individuals within his own department.
However great the threats on either side, the US Attorney's Office is pulling no punches. This seems to be a strong yet subtle tactic by Mr. Sagel whose failure to set higher bail was countered by the attempted defrocking of a top law enforcement official. Round 1 victory for the top cop, whose empty holster would equate to nothing other than symbolic political impotency.
Two other items struck me. One was the bail terms of the work-travel obligation for the Sheriff and his wife/co-defendant Deborah Carona, the other was Debra Hoffman's retainment of court appointed counsel.
Judge Block ruled that the Carona's were to stay away from all persons named in the indictment, as well as all potential witnesses and victims, yet they are permitted to attend political and work related events without engaging in direct communication with those prohibited. While Judge Block stated to the defense that these terms were clear, I find it ironic that Mrs. Carona is permitted to pursue her work and travels for the Orange County Fair Board, a board that the indictment states that the Sheriff used his political influence to facilitate the appointment of his wife (Page 19).
As an attorney, Debra Hoffman's retainment of court appointed counsel is even more surprising. Unless Carona or somebody else can cover her legal costs, I wouldn't be shocked if she further reduced her relatively slight legal battle by turning state's evidence against Carona for a probation term and a pricey fine.

The Claremont Institute's 20th 