« Log Cabin Republicans of CA Endorsements | Main | Sheriff's Campaign Mailbox: Mailers From Carona and AOCDS »

May 28, 2006

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c5af853ef00d834c3715269e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference OC Blog News Roundup -- May 28, 2006:

Comments

experienced voter in the 67th

Check out stopjimsilva.com

I learned of it from Art Pedroza's blog o-juice.blogspot.com

I have met quite a few, ANYONE BUT SILVA voters in H.B. and they are all Pro-lifers (most are from the Church I belong to) so I remind them that Dianne Harmon is pro-choice. As a result there is only 1 choice and that is Mike.

As has been pointed out about Mikes mistakes at least he is regretable and humble about it. Whereas Jim has a laundry list of mistakes that is over a decade long and he is not regrettable at all. In fact he has this big ego and thinks he is entitled to this office of Assembly.
So there you go.

Lazy Steve

Given Greenhut's history of intellectual laziness I am able to fill out my absentee ballot accordingly.

67th AD - McGill
72nd AD - Simonoff
5th BoS - DeYoung
2nd BoS - Shawver

He has a become a defacto mouthpiece for the OC GOP. And given that group's recent procedures in the Sheriff's endorsement is hardly one of ethical behaving individuals.

Lazy Steve

And don't even get me started on his criticism of the Davis administration when the State was being swindled by Enron during 'deregulation'.

Lay and Skilling are headed off to the slam and Greenhut says nothing. His commentary at the time only reinforces his lack of ability on this or any other matter.

I'm with "Lazy Steve"

Ah, finally something definitive in the only race I had not made up my mind on- the two great Republicans, Jubal and Greenhut, are tossing out their childlike, green-eyed barbs at Cassie. They have self-defined their own hardline rules for what a real GOP'er is, and give me invaluable information on which candidates I will not vote for. Thanks once again, guys!

Stop Jim Silva

www.stopjimsilva.com


At least with McGill and Harman they are both fairly predictable and consistent. With them you know exactly what you are getting. Vote your conscience on the one who best represents your views. I have found both to be accessable and unlike Silva, they would at least listen to their potential constituents.


On the other hand, Silva only answers to special interests and flips flops all over the place to appease them and will cut whatever deal necessary to get their financial support or their promise of not running an opposition candidate.(I.E. Supervisor race in 2002)

Silva is unstable, unpredictable, and erratic and could care less about his constituents.

The piece on Van Tran and legislative homes misses the mark by a wide margin. The facts are accurate but meaningless. Van has represented a significant portion of that district on a local city council for years and is an active member of a major ethnic community in the district as well. The author should have at least tried to find a genuine carpetbagger.

How about a bipartisan story about Umberg and Daucher? Neither is a part of the districts they now serve, nor are they interested in living in the Senate district they are running for. The facts are widely recognized and the author could offend partisans in both parties.

But that would be relevant and fun, so we will have to wait for the OC Weekly to do the story.

Lazy Steve

In the print edition, Shawver has a great letter that filets out Greenhut. Not that it's hard to do.

Seems he was censured by the council back in the 90's. He is a republican and he was censured by a council with a dem majority. What republican wouldn't want that?

Bottom line, he has shown leadership in his city. Moorlach's issue is pensions. Yet while being on the pension board he has shown NO leadership.

If I lived in that district, Shawver is the clear choice.

Art Pedroza

Lazy Steve,

Shawver also says that Moorlach caused the OC bankruptcy. That is crazy talk and that is why no one outside of the union ranks takes this nut seriously. Not to mention his role in forcing home owners to pay for city inspections...

Lazy Steve

Art. That's fine. My point is that Greenhut's biased is clear. If he is biased on purpose so be it and tell people. It is his pen after all.

If he is claiming to be objective then he isn't being honest in his commentary or his research.

Lazy Steve

Art. Before I forget. Good job on the OJ blog. You, Claudio and the others do a good job of presenting multiple perspectives.

Art Pedroza

Lazy Steve,

Thanks - that means a lot. As for Greenhut, I don't really expect him to be objective. He is an editorial columnist. His job is to have an axe to grind - and he does that very well. Most of the time he makes a lot of sense...certainly I think that Shawver will be a danger to us all if he gets on the board. We need to rein in the OC public employee's pensions, not augment them, or else we risk another OC bankruptcy...

Lazy Steve

Art. It's not that he lacks objectivity. That is a given. He conveniently leaves out facts known to him that skews his writing.

i.e. He blasted Deyoung for being the union's candidate. Knowing full well Bates is supported by twice as many union members.

Is that being disingenuous, or outright lying?

Art Pedroza

Lazy Steve,

It may mean that neither Bates nor De Young are worth a vote. I suspect that Bates is the lesser of two evils, so to speak. Her record as a legislator is not bad.

I'm with Lazy Steve

Well, that seals it! Not only Greenhut and Jubal for Bates, but now Art, too! Go, Cassie, go! You must be doing something right. But, Christ, ease up on the mailers, my poor (union, by the way) postal carrier is getting a hernia.

Screech

OK, the only left over issue to discuss on this thread is did Jubal agree to be outed by Greenhut?

Steven Greenhut

Screech:

Jubal outed himself on OC Blog, so why keep a secret even he isn't keeping?

The comments to this entry are closed.


OC Political Links